The miner suggests that each company or multinational engaged primarily in the extraction and sale of natural resources calculates its own G-Factor and makes it public for the parent company itself and each operating subsidiary.
The G-Factor for Natural Resources takes its name from the ‘g’s’ in ‘government,’ ‘governance’ and ‘good practice.’
“In an era witnessing significant strides in transparency and governance, and where extensive reporting on so many facets of corporate activity is already required in the annual reports of public companies, it is surprising that practical parameters allowing more direct insight into, and comparison of, the sharing of natural resource wealth still elude us,” Sean Gilbertson, Gemfields’ CEO, said in the press brief. “We invite collaboration, input and support for the adoption of the ‘G-Factor for Natural Resources’ as a step forward. We hope it will be voluntarily adopted by other companies, insisted upon by host countries and incorporated into projects such as EITI.”
Gilbertson explained that the G-Factor is expressed as a percentage and is calculated by adding up the total mineral royalty paid by the reporting company to the host country government during the relevant period; plus the total corporate tax paid to the host country government during the same period; plus the dividends paid by the reporting company to the host country government during the period if the host country government is a shareholder in the reporting company, and all of this divided by the total revenues of the reporting company during the period.
The formula looks like this:
Ap + Bp + Cp / Dp
- A = total mineral royalty (tax on revenue) paid to the host country government
- B = total corporate tax (tax on profit) paid to the host country government
- C = the dividends paid to the host country government (where the host country government is a shareholder in the reporting company)
- D = total revenues of the reporting company
- p = the relevant period, typically calculated for each of (i) the prior year; (ii) the preceding 5 years and (iii) the preceding 10 years
Gemfields suggests using the sums actually paid during the period, rather than the sums accrued or falling due during the period, for the purposes of A, B and C.
Gilbertson recognized that no measure of this type is perfect and, therefore, the G-Factor should be interpreted as a ‘rule-of-thumb,’ understanding that it may not be suited to every situation.
He also admitted that there are additional and indirect taxes that are not included in the G-Factor for Natural Resources and which further increase the contribution made to host nations by natural resource companies. Such taxes include area/surface charges, social security contributions, taxation on the salaries of employees, import and export duties, VAT, among others.
When it comes to comparing company to company using the new measure, the executive acknowledged that the variety and variations in natural resource deposits, types and occurrences lessen the ability to make direct comparisons.
Regardless of the caveats of the tool and to lead by example, Gemfields calculated the G-Factor for its two main operations, namely, the Montepuez mine in Mozambique, which is the world’s richest known ruby deposit and the only asset that generated a profit for the company last year, and the Kagem emerald mine in Zambia, which is responsible for approximately 25% of the world’s emerald supply.
Gemfields has made headlines two weeks in a row after a sudden, 10%-hike in its share price on July 9, which was attributed to “non-disclosable unpublished price-sensitive information”.
The firm, which returned to the London Stock Exchange’s market for juniors last year, revealed it expects to announce sales of $95 million for the first half of 2021, up 533% from the same period in 2020.